log
     Login   |   Register   
img
     
 
Back to Home

Modulating lysosomal pH: a molecular and nanoscale materials design perspective

Jialiu Zeng1,2,*, Orian S. Shirihai3,4 and Mark W. Grinstaff1,4,5,*

Author Information

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, BostonUniversity, Boston, MA 02215.

2Department of Neurology, School of Medicine,Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.

3Division of Endocrinology, Department ofMedicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, LosAngeles, Los Angeles, CA 90045

4Department of Medicine, Boston UniversitySchool of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118.

5Department of Chemistry, Boston University,Boston, MA 02215.

Correspondence: mgrin@bu.edu and zengjialiu@gmail.com


Citation Information
JoLS, J Life Sci, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 2020:25-37, https://doi.org/fmc2

Abstract Lysosomes, membrane-bound organelles, play important roles in cellular processes including endocytosis, phagocytosis, and autophagy. Lysosomes maintain cellular homeostasis by generating a highly acidic environment of pH 4.5 – 5.0 and by housing hydrolytic enzymes that degrade engulfed biomolecules. Impairment of lysosomal function, especially in its acidification, is a driving force in the pathogenesis of diseases including neurodegeneration, cancer, metabolic disorders, and infectious diseases. Therefore, lysosomal pH is an attractive and targetable site for therapeutic intervention. Currently, there is a dearth of strategies or materials available to specifically modulate lysosomal acidification. This review focuses on the key aspects of how lysosomal pH is implicated in various diseases and discusses design strategies and molecular or nanoscale agents for lysosomal pH modulation, with the ultimate goal of developing novel therapeutic solutions.

Introduction

Lysosomes are membrane-bound vesicles that play key roles in the degradation and recycling of extracellular and intracellular materials, hence maintaining crucial cellular homeostasis and immune functions. Lysosomes contain numerous hydrolytic enzymes that degrade biological polymers such as proteins, lipids, nucleic acids and polysaccharides.1,2 Lysosome function is tightly regulated by pH. Lysosomes are gaining increased attention for their role in cellular processes such as nutrient sensing, energy metabolism, as well as autophagy. A detailed discussion of these processes have been reviewed elsewhere3. Basal lysosomal pH is pH 4.5–5.0 with a buffering capacity of 19±6mM/pH unit14, and multiple channels including chloride channels (e.g. CLC-7, CLC-6, CLC-3), calcium channels (e.g. TRPML1) and V-ATPase5, regulate this maintenance.

Dysregulation of lysosomal acidification, and defects in lysosome-organelle fusion lead to impairment of endocytic function, autophagic degradation, macromolecules biogenesis and transport3, and are observed in proteinopathic neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, and immunological diseases. Lysosomal acidification dysfunction also affects the activity of other organelles, such as mitochondria, leading to increased production of reactive oxygen species and inflammatory cytokines6,7, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, cancer, and infectious diseases. Therefore, modulation of lysosomal acidification or pH is an increasingly important therapeutic target for disease management. In this review, we discuss the significance behind lysosomal pH modulation in diseases, with a focus on the major material design considerations for developing novel agents that specifically modulate lysosomal pH.

Lysosomal pH role and implication in disease pathogenesis

Lysosomes are the terminal degradative site/organelle for various cellular processes, including autophagy, which is an essential quality control machinery in the cells that degrade intracellular materials. Enhanced activation of the lysosome-autophagy process is being recognized as a driving force in the progression of numerous cancers, as it enables efficient nutrient scavenging and growth in nutrient-poor microenvironments8. Furthermore, the inhibition of lysosome-autophagy pathway leads to an increase in cellular apoptosis in tumors9. In pancreatic and lung adenocarcinomas, a lysosome mediated autophagic process systematically recycles cellular components, which provides nutrients for tumor growth in nutrient-deprived microenvironments. For instance, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells obtain essential amino acids and nucleotides from the lysosome-autophagy process when there is limited extracellular supply of these nutrients8. Small molecules such as chloroquine (CQ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and its derivatives inhibit lysosomal acidification through elevating lysosomal pH, thereby reducing autophagic degradation, and are effective in reducing cancer progression in refractory multiple myeloma, glioblastoma, melanoma, and breast cancer models10-14. Lysosome-autophagy processes are also implicated in the pathogenesis of viral diseases such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In dendritic cells, HIV inhibits lysosomal acidification and decreases lysosomal enzyme (e.g., cathepsins) activity. This effect impairs the digestion of viral particles, and reduces the ability of dendritic cells to inhibit antigen processing presentation to T cells15. Additionally, the inhibition of lysosomal acidification with lysosomal V-ATPase inhibitor, Bafilomycin A1, increases the HIV-1 SF2 viral strain infectivity by close to 50 times16. SARS-CoV-2 viral particles bind to ACE2 receptor and localize to the endolysosomal system, where the low pH environment cleaves the viral proteins and releases the viral RNA17. Treatment with E64d cysteine protease inhibitor, which blocks lysosomal enzymatic function, and Bafilomycin A1, which elevates lysosomal pH, blocks SARS-CoV-2 S-protein-mediated endolysosomal entry17,18. In clinical trials, where SARS-CoV-2 patients have been treated with HCQ, moderate responses in reducing SARS-CoV-2 viral load are seen19. In autoimmune diseases such as lupus, significant lysosomal pH elevation is present both in MRL/lpr mice (i.e., lupus disease mouse model) and splenic B cells compared to normal controls. This lysosomal pH elevation results in the reduction of lysosomal cathepsins and membrane proteins activity, inhibits elimination of immune complexes that accumulate as a result of deficits in complement, as well as reduces expression of scavenger receptors and increases expression of Fcγ receptors20, which initiate tissue inflammation through the release of harmful cytokines and chemokines21. In Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients carrying mutations in the SNCA gene, which encodes for the presynaptic protein α-synuclein, formation of insoluble α-synuclein-containing aggregates disrupts the autophagy process, and inhibits lysosomal acidification22,23. Similarly, in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)) induced experimental PD model, the exposure of neuroendocrine cells (e.g., PC-12 cells) to these neurotoxins results in mitochondria dysfunction, along with lysosomal pH elevation24,25. Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by intracellular aggregates of the tau protein and extracellular β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques. Lysosomal acidification dysfunction affords mutations in the gene encoding the presenilin-2 component of the γ-secretase enzyme, leading to accumulation of cleaved Aβ plaques26,27. In Down syndrome neurodevelopmental disorder which can lead to early-onset Alzheimer's disease, elevation of  β cleaved carboxy terminal fragment of APP (APP-βCTF) results in lysosomal pH elevation and cellular dysfunction28. Retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells degrade both intra- and extracellular debris generated by autophagic degradation as well as phagocytosed photoreceptor outer segments. Chronic exposure of RPE cells to N-retinylidene-N-retinylethinolamide (A2E), a byproduct of the visual phototransduction cycle, affords de-regulation of lysosomal acidification, autophagy inhibition and accumulation of cellular waste, contributing to the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration29-32. In metabolic disorders such as type II diabetes, pancreatic β-cells that have been chronically exposed to fatty acids (e.g., palmitic and oleic acids) show lysosomal acidification dysfunction, along with decreased mitochondrial activity and insulin sensitivity33-35. Likewise, hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes exposed to high levels of fatty acids exhibit disrupted lysosomal acidification and cellular dysfunction36,37. In sum, lysosomal pH plays a key role in disease pathogenesis, and it is imperative to design agents that specifically modulate lysosomal pH and rescue the associated cellular function impairments.

Biomaterial design strategies for modulating lysosomal pH

Currently, there are limited agents that specifically target lysosomal pH. The following design components or modules should be considered when synthesizing a novel material or agent to modulate lysosomal pH: 1) a lysosome localizing signal/motif or a delivery mechanism that enables efficient lysosome targeting; 2) a stimuli responsive biodegradable linker that affords degradation of the material within the lysosomal environment; and, 3) a liberated functional group from the degradation process, which is basic and increases lysosomal pH, or acidic and decreases the lysosomal pH. These design strategies are summarized in Figure 1.

Mechanism to ensure efficient targeting to the lysosomes

Key to this strategy is the targeting of materials – molecular or nanosized to the lysosome. Specific lysosome targeting is important because unspecific organelle targeting can potentially affect other organelles, such as the mitochondria, which in turn crosstalk and modulate lysosomal function as well6,38,39. One approach for lysosomal specific targeting is through the conjugation of lysosomal membrane targeting motifs, which enable specific uptake via receptor mediated endocytosis. In general, there are two classes of motifs for lysosomal targeting: A) tyrosine-based (Y) motif with YXXÏ• consensus sequence, where X can be any amino acid and Ï• is amino acid with bulky hydrophobic side chain that mainly targets the transferrin receptor, LAMP-1 or CD140, and B) dileucine-based motif with either a [DE]XXXL[LI] (i.e., the square brackets indicate alternatives) or a DXXLL pattern41-43. Additionally, the (aminoethyl)morpholine chemical group is a lysosome targeting motif44,45. Alternatively, conjugation of a small molecule to the mannose-6-phosphate group or derivative affords lysosome accumulation as the sugar is recognized by the Golgi and subsequently transported to the endosomal/lysosomal system46,47. For instance, the lysosome targeting chimeras (LYTACS), which composes of a target binding moiety (e.g., small molecule) linked to mannose-6-phosphonate (M6Pn), a CI-M6PR binding ligand, allow for specific lysosome localization48. Ahn et al. further modified the LYTACs design to be liver cell specific, through conjugation of an asialoglycoprotein receptor, which recognizes glycoproteins bearing N-acetylgalactosamine or galactose ligands present on liver cells49. To target specifically to brain cells, blood barrier targeting peptides are also used50

A second general strategy is to use nanosized particles, of diameters ranging from 25 – 200 nm, which rapidly uptake into cells and localize to subcellular organelles (e.g., lysosomes) via endocytosis51,52. The sizes and shapes of these nanoparticles are finely tuned by varying the material, synthesis methods, and types of surface ligand, which also influence their targeting and localization efficiency53. To improve the lysosomal targeting and localization efficiency of hydrophilic CQ and HCQ molecules (Figure 2), encapsulation of these small molecules in poly (lactic acid) nanoparticles affords higher efficacy in reducing Herpes simplex virus type 1 infections in VeroE6 cells compared to either using CQ or HCQ alone54,55. In another instance, CQ encapsulated poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid polyester (PLGA) nanoparticles increase autophagy inhibition in A549 multidrug resistance cells56. HCQ loaded hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles localize to lysosomes and improve autophagic inhibition and therapeutic efficacy in colon tumor tissues57. HCQ loaded liposomes decorated with a pH-sensitive TH-RGD targeting peptide increase accumulation of HCQ in B16F10 tumor cells and lysosomes, leading to blockage of autophagic flux in tumor cells, along with reduced tumor growth58. Finally, liposomal nanocarriers modified with octadecyl-rhodamine B, localize to lysosomes, suggesting that this is another approach to targeting lysosome accumulation59,60.

Diagram

Description automatically generated

Figure 1. Schematic showing the material design strategies, including a cell membrane targetable ligand, which allows for lysosomal localization via receptor mediated endocytosis, a stimuli responsive linker that is degradable, and a liberated group that can modulate lysosomal pH. This schematic is created with BioRender.com.

Stimuli responsive biodegradable linkages

Polymers with weakly acidic or basic residues are often utilized as pH-responsive polymers. This group of polymers includes polyesters, polyanhydrides, polycarbonates and others, and their properties and synthesis procedures have been reviewed elsewhere61. Polyesters can be readily hydrolyzed in mild aqueous acid to release carboxylic acids groups. For instance, poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid polyester (PLGA) based nanoparticle, with an ester linkage, release carboxylic acid upon contact with the low lysosomal pH environment (i.e., pH 6.0), and further lower lysosomal pH in MPTP-induced PD24,25, type II diabetes62 and age-related macular degeneration31disease cell models. Polyanhydrides also degrade into component carboxylic acids; however, polyanhydrides generally have a lower degree of dissociation and do not change pH value as much as polyesters within similar time frame of degradation63,64. The lysosomal environment contains enzymes, such as cathepsins, which hydrolyze and degrade chemical linkages, hence several research groups are investigating cathepsin B enzyme specific degradable linkages that enable specific compound release upon enzymatic cleavage65. Apart from leveraging the lysosomal environment as a stimuli/trigger, light-activated cleavable linkages are also employed to release acids to modulate lysosomal pH. Using a UV-light (e.g., 365 nm) labile biodegradable linkage group, 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethan-1-ol, Trudeau et al. reduce lysosomal pH in pancreatic β-cells under chronic exposure to palmitic acid, through the release of carboxylic acid groups from a nanoparticle34,35. Other externally applied stimuli include near-infrared (750 nm) responsive cleavable linkages, which enable higher tissue penetration depth compared to UV light, and are of utility for applications in in vivo models66. Such near-infrared systems are worthy to explore for this application. 

Liberated basic/acidic functional groups increase/decrease lysosomal pH

To either increase or decrease lysosomal pH, the component group released upon cleavage by the acidic lysosomal environment or enzyme should be either a base or an acid. The pKa of the released component should be higher than the basal lysosomal pH (4.5 – 5.0) for pH elevation, or lower than the basal level for pH reduction. Small molecules such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (pKas of 4.0, 8.3 and 9.7), and chloroquine (CQ) (pKas of 4.0, 8.4 and 10.2), elevate lysosomal pH, due to the presence of basic side chains, which allows it to act as weak bases67. In African green monkey kidney VeroE6 cells infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the addition of either CQ or HCQ inhibits lysosomal acidification, along with a reduction in virus multiplicities of infection68. Analogues of CQ/HCQ, such as Nitazoxanide (pKa 8.3) and ROC-325 (pKa 8.3)69,70, also inhibit lysosomal acidification, and reduce glioma and acute myeloid leukemia cell viability and proliferation, respectively (Figure 2)69-71. Small molecules IITZ-01 (pKas 4.7, 5.4, 11.54, 12.54 13.7, 54.88) and IITZ-02 (pKa 4.75, 5.42, 11.56, 12.65, 14.49), which are benzimidazole containing two s-triazine analogs, are basic and de-acidify lysosomes and inhibit tumor growth in triple negative breast cancer cellular and mouse models14. Comprising of two basic pyrrole groups, obatoclax mesylate (pKas 4.68, 13.97) also elevate lysosomal pH in ovarian cancer models, thereby contributing to cell death72,73. Contrary to releasing basic groups to elevate lysosomal pH, Hong et al. synthesized compounds based on lysosome-targeting fluorescent anion transporters derived from coumarins, trifluoromethylated arylsquaramides and morpholines, which elevate lysosomal pH through increasing chloride ions efflux out of the lysosomes74.

In contrast, the number of compounds that lower lysosomal pH is substantially smaller. Materials that release acidic components to lower the lysosomal pH include the polyester, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). PLGA degrades in an acidic environment to release lactic and glycolic component carboxylic acids with pKas of 3.86 and 3.83 respectively62, resulting in lysosomal pH reduction in various disease models with elevated lysosomal pH24,25,31,75,76. The chemical structures for these agents or materials mentioned above are shown in Figure 2.

 

Diagram

Description automatically generated
Diagram

Description automatically generated

Figure 2. Agents that are currently being investigated for lysosomal pH modulating applications. This can be categorized into agents that can either A) elevate lysosomal pH, or B) lower lysosomal pH. This figure is created with BioRender.com.

Conclusion

Lysosomal pH is an important modulator of various cellular processes. Herein, we review the significance of lysosomal acidification in disease pathogenesis, as well as material designs and strategies to ensure efficient lysosomal targeting and modulation of lysosomal pH. These strategies include the presence of a lysosome targeting motif, a stimuli-responsive degradable linker, either acidic or basic functional groups, and the potential to encapsulate or deliver active agents in the form of nanoparticles. Depending on the specific applications, some or all the design strategies are applicable to the materials in development. To ensure that the change in cellular function is solely due to a change in lysosomal pH, it is also important to design experiments with proper controls, such as through the addition of lysosomal V-ATPase inhibitor Bafilomycin A1, and lysosomal protease inhibitor, E64d. Since lysosome function can also affect other organelle functions (e.g., mitochondria function), it is prudent to assess the function of these organelles, along with lysosomal functional changes. Finally, evaluation of these materials or agents in in vivo models to determine efficacy and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters is critical to pre-clinical development. With proper experimental controls and designs, we will gain a better mechanistic understanding of the effect of lysosomal pH on downstream cellular processes and insights on optimizing agents that control lysosomal acidification to rescue cellular dysfunctions. Our vision is to translate these materials or concepts into therapeutic agents.  

Author contributions

JLZ conceptualized the idea and wrote the manuscript. OSS and MWG have edited and consented to the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by National Institutes of Health R21 grant NIH AG063373 and AG060456, BU Nanotechnology center at Boston University.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

1. Wang, F., Gómez-Sintes, R. & Boya, P. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization and cell death. Traffic 19, 918-931 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12613 PMid:30125440

 

2. De Duve, C., Pressman, B. C., Gianetto, R., Wattiaux, R. & Appelmans, F. Tissue fractionation studies. 6. Intracellular distribution patterns of enzymes in rat-liver tissue. Biochem. J. 60, 604-617 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0600604 PMid:13249955 PMCid:PMC1216159

 
 

3. Lawrence, R. E. & Zoncu, R. The lysosome as a cellular centre for signalling, metabolism and quality control. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 133-142 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0244-7 PMid:30602725

 
 

4. Gekle, M. & Silbernagl, S. Comparison of the buffer capacity of endocytotic vesicles, lysosomes and cytoplasm in cells derived from the proximal tubule of the kidney (opossum kidney cells). Pflugers Arch. 429, 452-454 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374165 PMid:7761271

 

 

5. Mindell, J. A. Lysosomal acidification mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 74, 69-86 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142317 PMid:22335796

 
 

6. Deus, C. M., Yambire, K. F., Oliveira, P. J. & Raimundo, N. Mitochondria-Lysosome Crosstalk: From Physiology to Neurodegeneration. Trends Mol. Med. 26, 71-88 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.10.009 PMid:31791731

 
 

7. Yambire, K. F. et al. Impaired lysosomal acidification triggers iron deficiency and inflammation in vivo. Elife 8, e51031 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51031 PMid:31793879 PMCid:PMC6917501

 
 

8. White, E. The role for autophagy in cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 42-46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI73941 PMid:25654549 PMCid:PMC4382247

 
 

9. Desantis, V. et al. Autophagy: A New Mechanism of Prosurvival and Drug Resistance in Multiple Myeloma. Transl. Oncol. 11, 1350-1357 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.08.014 PMid:30196237 PMCid:PMC6132177

 
 

10. Mahalingam, D. et al. Combined autophagy and HDAC inhibition: a phase I safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic analysis of hydroxychloroquine in combination with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors. Autophagy 10, 1403-1414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.29231 PMid:24991835 PMCid:PMC4203517

 
 

11. Rangwala, R. et al. Combined MTOR and autophagy inhibition: phase I trial of hydroxychloroquine and temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and melanoma. Autophagy 10, 1391-1402 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.29119 https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.29118

 
 

12. Rangwala, R. et al. Phase I trial of hydroxychloroquine with dose-intense temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors and melanoma. Autophagy 10, 1369-1379 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.29119 https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.29118 PMid:24991839 PMCid:PMC4203514

 
 

13. Rosenfeld, M. R. et al. A phase I/II trial of hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with radiation therapy and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Autophagy 10, 1359-1368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.28984 PMid:24991840 PMCid:PMC4203513

 
 

14. Guntuku, L. et al. IITZ-01, a novel potent lysosomotropic autophagy inhibitor, has single-agent antitumor efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene 38, 581-595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0446-2 PMid:30166591

 
 

15. Zhou, D., Kang, K. H. & Spector, S. A. Production of interferon α by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells is dependent on induction of autophagy. J. Infect. Dis. 205, 1258-1267 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis187 PMid:22396599 PMCid:PMC3308911

 
 

16. Fredericksen, B. L., Wei, B. L., Yao, J., Luo, T. & Garcia, J. V. Inhibition of endosomal/lysosomal degradation increases the infectivity of human immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol. 76, 11440-11446 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.76.22.11440-11446.2002 PMid:12388705 PMCid:PMC136743

 
 

17. Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 181, 271-280.e8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052 PMid:32142651 PMCid:PMC7102627

 
 

18. Blaess, M., Kaiser, L., Sauer, M., Csuk, R. & Deigner, H.-P. COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Lysosomes and Lysosomotropism Implicate New Treatment Strategies and Personal Risks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144953 PMid:32668803 PMCid:PMC7404102

 
 

19. Gautret, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 105949 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949 PMid:32205204 PMCid:PMC7102549

 
 

20. Pickering, M. C., Botto, M., Taylor, P. R., Lachmann, P. J. & Walport, M. J. Systemic lupus erythematosus, complement deficiency, and apoptosis. Adv. Immunol. 76, 227-324 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2776(01)76021-X 

 
 

21. Monteith, A. J. et al. Defects in lysosomal maturation facilitate the activation of innate sensors in systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, E2142-51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513943113 PMid:27035940 PMCid:PMC4839468

 
 

22. Winslow, A. R. et al. α-Synuclein impairs macroautophagy: implications for Parkinson's disease. J. Cell Biol. 190, 1023-1037 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201003122 PMid:20855506 PMCid:PMC3101586

 
 

23. Pan, T., Kondo, S., Le, W. & Jankovic, J. The role of autophagy-lysosome pathway in neurodegeneration associated with Parkinson's disease. Brain 131, 1969-1978 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm318 PMid:18187492

 
 

24. Zeng, J., Martin, A., Han, X., Shirihai, O. S. O. S. & Grinstaff, M. W. M. W. Biodegradable PLGA Nanoparticles Restore Lysosomal Acidity and Protect Neural PC-12 Cells against Mitochondrial Toxicity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 13910-13917 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02003

 
 

25. Bourdenx, M. et al. Nanoparticles restore lysosomal acidification defects: Implications for Parkinson and other lysosomal-related diseases. Autophagy 12, 472-483 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2015.1136769 PMid:26761717 PMCid:PMC4835967

 
 

26. Cataldo, A. M. et al. App gene dosage modulates endosomal abnormalities of Alzheimer's disease in a segmental trisomy 16 mouse model of down syndrome. J. Neurosci. 23, 6788-6792 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-17-06788.2003 PMid:12890772 PMCid:PMC6740714

 
 

27. Li, X. et al. Discovery of nitazoxanide-based derivatives as autophagy activators for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 646-666 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2019.07.006 PMid:32322468 PMCid:PMC7161708

 
 

28. Jiang, Y. et al. Lysosomal Dysfunction in Down Syndrome Is APP-Dependent and Mediated by APP-βCTF (C99). J. Neurosci. 39, 5255 LP - 5268 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0578-19.2019 PMid:31043483 PMCid:PMC6607756

 
 

29. Liu, J. et al. Restoration of lysosomal pH in RPE cells from cultured human and ABCA4(-/-) mice: pharmacologic approaches and functional recovery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49, 772-780 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0675 PMid:18235027 PMCid:PMC2279299

 
 

30. Lu, W. et al. The P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist Ticagrelor Reduces Lysosomal pH and Autofluorescence in Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Cells From the ABCA4-/- Mouse Model of Retinal Degeneration. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 242 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00242 PMid:29725296 PMCid:PMC5917064

 
 

31. Baltazar, G. C. et al. Acidic nanoparticles are trafficked to lysosomes and restore an acidic lysosomal pH and degradative function to compromised ARPE-19 cells. PLoS One 7, e49635 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049635 PMid:23272048 PMCid:PMC3525582

 
 

32. Guha, S., Liu, J., Baltazar, G., Laties, A. M. & Mitchell, C. H. Rescue of compromised lysosomes enhances degradation of photoreceptor outer segments and reduces lipofuscin-like autofluorescence in retinal pigmented epithelial cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 801, 105-111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_14 PMid:24664687 PMCid:PMC4163923

 
 

33. Las, G., Serada, S. B., Wikstrom, J. D., Twig, G. & Shirihai, O. S. Fatty acids suppress autophagic turnover in β-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42534-42544 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.242412 PMid:21859708 PMCid:PMC3234912

 
 

34. Assali, E. A. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated lysosomal reacidification restores mitochondrial turnover and function in β cells under lipotoxicity. FASEB J. (2019) doi:10.1096/fj.201801292R. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201801292R PMid:30550357

 
 

35. Trudeau, K. M. et al. Lysosome acidification by photoactivated nanoparticles restores autophagy under lipotoxicity. J. Cell Biol. 214, 25-34 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201511042 PMid:27377248 PMCid:PMC4932370

 
 

36. Inami, Y. et al. Hepatic steatosis inhibits autophagic proteolysis via impairment of autophagosomal acidification and cathepsin expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 412, 618-25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.012 PMid:21856284

 
 

37. Liu, Y. et al. Palmitate-Induced Vacuolar-Type H(+)-ATPase Inhibition Feeds Forward Into Insulin Resistance and Contractile Dysfunction. Diabetes 66, 1521-1534 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-0727 PMid:28302654

 
 

38. Plotegher, N. & Duchen, M. R. Crosstalk between Lysosomes and Mitochondria in Parkinson's Disease . Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology vol. 5 110 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00110 PMid:29312935 PMCid:PMC5732996

 
 

39. Guerra, F. et al. Synergistic Effect of Mitochondrial and Lysosomal Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease. Cells 8, (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8050452 
PMid:31091796 PMCid:PMC6563092

 
 

40. Pandey, K. N. Small peptide recognition sequence for intracellular sorting. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21, 611-620 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.08.007  PMid:20817434 PMCid:PMC2997389

 
 

41. Behnke, J., Eskelinen, E.-L., Saftig, P. & Schröder, B. Two dileucine motifs mediate late endosomal/lysosomal targeting of transmembrane protein 192 (TMEM192) and a C-terminal cysteine residue is responsible for disulfide bond formation in TMEM192 homodimers. Biochem. J. 434, 219-231 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20101396 PMid:21143193

 
 

42. Sakhrani, N. M. & Padh, H. Organelle targeting: third level of drug targeting. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 7, 585-599 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45614
PMid:23898223 PMCid:PMC3718765

 
 

43. Contu, V. R. et al. Lysosomal targeting of SIDT2 via multiple YxxΦ motifs is required for SIDT2 function in the process of RNautophagy. J. Cell Sci. 130, 2843 LP - 2853 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.202481 PMid:28724756

 
 

44. Yang, S. et al. Design of a simultaneous target and location-activatable fluorescent probe for visualizing hydrogen sulfide in lysosomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7508-7515 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac501263d PMid:24975419

 
 

45. Wan, Q., Chen, S., Shi, W., Li, L. & Ma, H. Lysosomal pH rise during heat shock monitored by a lysosome-targeting near-infrared ratiometric fluorescent probe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 10916-10920 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201405742 PMid:25154475

 
 

46. Coutinho, M. F., Prata, M. J. & Alves, S. Mannose-6-phosphate pathway: a review on its role in lysosomal function and dysfunction. Mol. Genet. Metab. 105, 542-550 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.12.012 PMid:22266136

 
 

47. Louzoun-Zada, S., Jaber, Q. Z. & Fridman, M. Guiding Drugs to Target-Harboring Organelles: Stretching Drug-Delivery to a Higher Level of Resolution. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 58, 15584-15594 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201906284 PMid:31237741

 
 

48. Banik, S. M. et al. Lysosome-targeting chimaeras for degradation of extracellular proteins. Nature 584, 291-297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2545-9 PMid:32728216

 
 

49. Green Ahn, Steven Banik, Caitlyn L. Miller, Nicholas Riley, Jennifer R. Cochran, C. B. Lysosome Targeting Chimeras (LYTACs) That Engage a Liver-Specific Asialoglycoprotein Receptor for Targeted Protein Degradation. ChemRxiv (2020). 

 
 

50. McCully, M., Sanchez-Navarro, M., Teixido, M. & Giralt, E. Peptide Mediated Brain Delivery of Nano- and Submicroparticles: A Synergistic Approach. Curr. Pharm. Des. 24, 1366-1376 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666171201115126 PMid:29205110 PMCid:PMC6110044

 
 

51. Zhang, S., Li, J., Lykotrafitis, G., Bao, G. & Suresh, S. Size-Dependent Endocytosis of Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 21, 419-424 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200801393 PMid:19606281 PMCid:PMC2709876

 
 

52. Rathore, B. et al. Nanomaterial designing strategies related to cell lysosome and their biomedical applications: A review. Biomaterials 211, 25-47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.002 PMid:31078050

 
 

53. Caldorera-Moore, M., Guimard, N., Shi, L. & Roy, K. Designer nanoparticles: incorporating size, shape and triggered release into nanoscale drug carriers. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 7, 479-495 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1517/17425240903579971 PMid:20331355 PMCid:PMC2845970

 
 

54. Lima, T. L. C. et al. Improving Encapsulation of Hydrophilic Chloroquine Diphosphate into Biodegradable Nanoparticles: A Promising Approach against Herpes Virus Simplex-1 Infection. Pharmaceutics 10, 255 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10040255 PMid:30513856 PMCid:PMC6320969

 
 

55. Oller-Salvia, B., Sánchez-Navarro, M., Giralt, E. & Teixidó, M. Blood-brain barrier shuttle peptides: an emerging paradigm for brain delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 4690-4707 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00076B PMid:27188322

 
 

56. Sun, J.-H. et al. Co-delivery nanoparticles of doxorubicin and chloroquine for improving the anti-cancer effect in vitro. Nanotechnology 30, 85101 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aaf51b PMid:30523865 

 
 

57. Li, Y. et al. Hydroxychloroquine-loaded hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhanced autophagy inhibition and radiation therapy. J. Control. Release 325, 100-110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.06.025 PMid:32621826

 
 

58. Wang, Y. et al. Significantly enhanced tumor cellular and lysosomal hydroxychloroquine delivery by smart liposomes for optimal autophagy inhibition and improved antitumor efficiency with liposomal doxorubicin. Autophagy 12, 949-962 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1162930 PMid:27123811 PMCid:PMC4922436

 
 

59. Meerovich, I., Koshkaryev, A., Thekkedath, R. & Torchilin, V. P. Screening and Optimization of Ligand Conjugates for Lysosomal Targeting. Bioconjug. Chem. 22, 2271-2282 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/bc200336j PMid:21913714 PMCid:PMC3218248

 
 

60. Torchilin, V. P. Next step in drug delivery: getting to individual organelles. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2, 415-417 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-012-0102-2 PMid:23565351 PMCid:PMC3615566

 
 

61. Kocak, G., Tuncer, C. & Bütün, V. pH-Responsive polymers. Polym. Chem. 8, 144-176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6PY01872F

 
 

62. Zeng, J., Shirihai, O. S. & Grinstaff, M. W. Degradable Nanoparticles Restore Lysosomal pH and Autophagic Flux in Lipotoxic Pancreatic Beta Cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 0, 1801511 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801511 PMid:30698920

 
 

63. Chu, I.-M., Liu, T.-H. & Chen, Y.-R. Preparation and characterization of sustained release system based on polyanhydride microspheres with core/shell-like structures. J. Polym. Res. 26, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-018-1657-5

 
 

64. Carbone, A. L. & Uhrich, K. E. Design and Synthesis of Fast-Degrading Poly(anhydride-esters). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 30, 1021 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200900029 PMid:20161638 PMCid:PMC2818006

 
 

65. Wang, Y. et al. Lysosome-Targeting Fluorogenic Probe for Cathepsin B Imaging in Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 88, 12403-12410 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03717 PMid:28193055

 
 

66. Luciano, M. P. et al. Chapter Eleven - A near-infrared light-mediated cleavable linker strategy using the heptamethine cyanine chromophore. in Chemical Tools for Imaging, Manipulating, and Tracking Biological Systems: Diverse Chemical, Optical and Bioorthogonal Methods (ed. Chenoweth, D. M. B. T.-M. in E.) vol. 641 245-275 (Academic Press, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2020.04.043 PMid:32713525

 
 

67. Schrezenmeier, E. & Dörner, T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 155-166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x PMid:32034323

 
 

68. Liu, J. et al. Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Cell Discov. 6, 16 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0156-0 PMid:32194981 PMCid:PMC7078228

 
 

69. Wang, X. et al. Nitazoxanide, an antiprotozoal drug, inhibits late-stage autophagy and promotes ING1-induced cell cycle arrest in glioblastoma. Cell Death Dis. 9, 1032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-1058-z PMid:30302016 PMCid:PMC6177448

 
 

70. Jones, T. M., Espitia, C., Wang, W., Nawrocki, S. T. & Carew, J. S. Moving beyond hydroxychloroquine: the novel lysosomal autophagy inhibitor ROC-325 shows significant potential in preclinical studies. Cancer Commun. 39, 72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0418-0 PMid:31706349 PMCid:PMC6842502

 
 

71. Nawrocki, S. T. et al. The novel autophagy inhibitor ROC-325 augments the antileukemic activity of azacitidine. Leukemia 33, 2971-2974 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0529-2 PMid:31358855 PMCid:PMC7462348

 
 

72. Stamelos, V. A. et al. The BH3 Mimetic Obatoclax Accumulates in Lysosomes and Causes Their Alkalinization. PLoS One 11, e0150696-e0150696 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150696 PMid:26950068 PMCid:PMC4780728

 
 

73. Champa, D. et al. Obatoclax kills anaplastic thyroid cancer cells by inducing lysosome neutralization and necrosis. Oncotarget 7, 34453-34471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9121 PMid:27144341 PMCid:PMC5085168

 
 

74. Hong, X.-Q., He, X.-Y., Tam, K. Y. & Chen, W.-H. Synthesis and biological effect of lysosome-targeting fluorescent anion transporters with enhanced anionophoric activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 30, 127461 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127461 PMid:32755679

 
 

75. Zasadny;, F. M., Ankrum;, J. A. & Abel, E. D. Lysosomal reacidification via degradation of PLGA nanoparticles in a lipotoxic cardiomyopathy model. in (Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress., 2016). doi:10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.01307.
https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.01307

 
 

76. Zeng, J., Shirihai, O. S. & Grinstaff, M. W. Degradable Nanoparticles Restore Lysosomal pH and Autophagic Flux in Lipotoxic Pancreatic Beta Cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801511 PMid:30698920

 
 
 
footer